Call us 24/7: + 1(925)399 0085

Get your paper done by an expert

No matter what kind of academic paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcer. Save more time for yourself.

WhatsApp + 1(925)399 0085
$ 10
free
  • bibliography
  • title page
  • revisions
per page
19 k happy customers
4.7 out of 5 satisfaction rate
27 writers active

| Chesterfield County Airport Essay

Chesterfield County Airport (FCI) is a general aviation airport, whose facility is categorized as a reliever airport to Richmond International Airport, according to the Categories and Aircraft Design Groups of National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems and Virginia Air Transportation System Plan. According to the data reported to Virginia Department of Aviation in 2009, the airport serves as a base for 130 aircrafts, and “accommodates approximately 82,500 civilian and military flight operations each year”. Furthermore, FCI serves single-engine and twin-engine aircraft and corporate jet traffic and is classified as C-II airport, according to the Airport Reference Code specifications of FAA AC 150/5300-13 of aircraft approach categories and approach speed. The critical aircraft is noted as the Gulfstream III, which has approach speed of 136 knots, wingspan of 78 feet, and maximum take-off speed of 68, 700 lbs.

The airport is located fourteen miles south of Richmond, Virginia and can be accessed via State Route 10, known as an Ironbridge Road, through Whitepine Road, and through Airfield Drive. The intersection of Interstate 95 and State Route 288 adjacent to the airport in the Richmond Area is considered the principal access to FCI. Furthermore, the Interstate 95 highway extends 120 miles to the north and reaches Washington D.C. while Interstate 64 leads to Norfolk and Tidewater Virginia, which are located 90 miles southeast of the airport.

According to the latest estimates, the total economic impact of FCI reaches $ 17 million while $ 6,7 million is paid in annual wages through the provision of employment at the airport. The airport’s funding structure consists of 90% of federal funds, 8% of state funds, and 2% of local funds. In this respect, the main stakeholders of the airport are Federal Aviation Administration, Virginia Department of Aviation, and Chesterfield County, which provide funds for the airport bonds, public infrastructure and development while capital projects are funded from surplus revenues.

In addition, considering performance characteristics of the airport’s critical aircraft and conditions for the financing of the project, facilities requirements and environmental concerns should be analyzed to achieve the master plan’s objectives and standards of the FAA regulations.

Facilities Requirements, Environment Concerns and Gaining Control over Runway Protection Zone of the Long Range Master Plan

The Five-Member Board of Supervisors governs in the capacity of County Administration form on behalf of County of Chesterfield, which owns and operates the airport. The day-to-day operations of the facility are overseen by the appointed full-time airport manager. An Advisory Board of Supervisors consists of six members, who are in charge of matters in relation to the airport capacity and operations.

FCI is categorized as a public use airport, considering 10,000 of annual aircraft operations, County governance, and Class E accommodation of jet traffic at low altitude. The airport was categorized as a Class E according to the Federal Aviation Regulation, whose specifications corresponds to the FCI’s vertical extension to 18,00 feet of Mean Sea Level when it starts at 700 feet Above Ground Level.

The facilities available at the airport are located in the east side of FCI property. Terminal Building is the nearest location to taxiway “C” and serves as a gateway to the local community, as well as a transition point for pilots and passengers. 339 automobile parking spaces are located in the terminal area and include spaces for handicap and rental car services for public use. 6 T-hangar structures are located on the east of the terminal building area and include five 20-unit buildings and one 10-unit buildings. The north terminal area accommodates 85 tie-downs with 38 positioned apron areas. Furthermore, there are 12,000 gallons of jet fuel and 100LL of Avgas in the underground fuel farm.

Regardless the fact that, FCI meets the pollutant criteria to be recognized as the “attainment area” according to the specifications of National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the airport is located within the Virginia’s coastal zone, while aircraft noise from construction equipment is considered as a primary cause of incompatibility between the facility and surrounding communities. Furthermore, some lands surrounding airport property have the Day Night Average Sound Level of 65-75 decibels of the total sound energy during a 24hour period, which is incompatible under the FAA regulations. Although it was inspected that, there were no hazardous impacts from the fueling activities, the conditions of the underground storage tanks, which can be accessed from Airfield Drive can contaminate surface waters, soils and groundwater.

The following existing conditions impede sufficient performance of the airport’s operations:

1) Non-standard separation between Runway 15-33 and Taxiway “A”, which includes 375 feet while standards ARC C-II indicates 400 feet;

2) Insufficient runway length of 5,500 feet;

3) Inappropriate airfield maintenance and equipment building, while maintenance activities are carried out in a 16,625 hangar building by the Fixed Base Operators;

4) Absence of control over the Runway Protection Zone, between Runway 15 and Runway 33, which impedes performance of clearing and maintenance of incompatible activities.

Although, the anticipated infrastructure development includes 20-year planning horizon, the design of the runway extension and mitigation of obstructions are programmed to be implemented by 2015.

Evaluation of the Future Implementation Plan

Data collection and data evaluation help identify that the growth of the annual operations is forecasted to exceed 14,000 aircraft operations compering to the existing 10,000 operations, which were calculated in 2008. In this respect, the airport’s airfield capacity will not be feasible to accommodate the critical aircraft Gulfstream III since the runway length of 5,500 feet does not allow sufficient taxiing operations of this aircraft within the existing runway centerline.

Therefore, qualitative methods help identify that 800 foot extension for the end of Runway 15 is needed because FAA regulations specify that the largest aircraft is expected to operate on the parallel taxiway, and whenever runway is in use, the aircraft on that taxiway is required to hold a distance of 295 feet from the runway centerline. Furthermore, these methods help identify that separation between Runway 15-33 and Taxiway “A” should be increased on 25 feet, which will require a reduction of the taxiway to 35 feet, and a reduction of the Localizer Performance Visibility to lower than 0,75 miles. Data analysis methods help identify that if visibility approach is less than 3 miles, the airfield capacity can be improved with the help of instrument approach procedures.

In this respect, quantitative methods help justify that usage of the Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System will help to increase the lighting intensity to 40 watts if the visibility drops below 3 miles. Furthermore, these methods identified that relocation of the parallel taxiway and absence of Air Traffic Control Tower requires relocation of the localizer, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI), and glide slope equipment (County of Chesterfield, 2012). Considering the fact that, the pilot’s eye percepts the ILS glide path indication lower that its actual setting, when PAPI and ILS are used together on the left side of the runway, they help provide the precise correlation between the two approach paths.

Type of assignmentWriter levelTitle of your paperPages
Essay Term paper Coursework Research paper Research proposal Grant Proposal Case Study Case Brief Discussion Board Post Reaction paper Response paper Literary analysis Article Review Article Critique Movie Review Movie Critique Book Report Book Review Synopsis Poem Letter Motivation letter Memo Scholarship essay Article writing Blog Article Annotated Bibliography Literature Review Outline Online Test Questions-Answers Multiple Choice Questions Interview Questionnaire Speech Dissertation Dissertation chapter – Abstract Dissertation chapter – Introduction Dissertation chapter – Hypothesis Dissertation chapter – Literature review Dissertation chapter – Methodology Dissertation chapter – Results Dissertation chapter – Discussion Dissertation chapter – Conclusion Thesis Thesis Proposal Thesis/dissertation chapter Capstone Project IB Extended Essay Lab Report Business Report Business plan Marketing Plan White paper Formatting Editing Proofreading Rewriting Revision Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation Poster PDF Poster Excel Exercises High School College University Master’s PHD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500
SpacingTimeframesCurrencyTotal price
Single spaced Double spaced 11 days 9 days 7 days 5 days 4 days 3 days 48 hours 24 hours 12 hours 8 hours 6 hours 3 hours USD EUR GBP AUD

Additionally, quantitative methods help identify that rotating beacon should be replaced when approach procedures require reliable signals to the pilot with the help of localizer of the horizontal guidance at the touchdown point. Since each frequency of the localizer is paired with the vertical guidance of the glide slope, it should also be relocated to provide a three degree descent measurement.

Data analysis help identify that the established standards for maintenance activities, shortage of funds from Fixed Base Operators require expansion of the airfield maintenance building by 1,500 square feet, and provision of 2,000 square feet equipment building to store future snow removals. Furthermore, considering the fact that, the fuel farm is located on the Whitepine Road, the facility requires construction of the alternative 24-hour fuel site since the airport owns and maintains buildings that perform fuel activities. The airport layout design for the Runway 15-33 extension can be seen in Appendix A.

In addition, regardless the fact that 95% of the $ 260,000 project expenses will be funded by the federal government institution, the runway extension from 5,500 feet to 6,300 feet will require intersection of 5, 5 acre of the privately owned property.

Conclusion. SWOT Analysis of the Future Development of FCI

The structured planning of the future implementation plan helped identify favorable and unfavorable factors for achievement of the master plan objectives. The strengths of the project are based on the gaining of interest and control over the 1, 5 acre portion of the RPZ, which can be achieved with the proposed runway extension from 5,500 feet to 6,300 feet. In this respect, the airport has an opportunity to expand the existing building for airfield maintenance by 1,500 square foot and increase the space of the facility for additional location for the snow removal equipment by 2,000 square foot. Furthermore, the airport is projecting to apply up-to-date NAVAIDS such as MIALS and noise counters, due to the absence of the ATCT in the airport location, and owing to the necessity to mitigate noise issues.

The weaknesses of the project are based on the necessity to reduce Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance visibility minima to lower than ¾ miles, due to the reduction of the taxiway to 35 feet, and relocation of the parallel taxiway. Furthermore, the threats of the project are based on the possibility of intersection of 5, 5 acre of the privately owned land, due to the need of the reconstruction of the Runway 15-33 extension.

Our guarantees

Study Acers provides students with tutoring and help them save time, and excel in their courses. Students LOVE us!No matter what kind of essay paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcers. Save more time for yourself. Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Our Homework Writing Disciplines

With a highly diverse team in almost all academic fields including: