Call us 24/7: + 1(925)399 0085

Get your paper done by an expert

No matter what kind of academic paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcer. Save more time for yourself.

WhatsApp + 1(925)399 0085
$ 10
  • bibliography
  • title page
  • revisions
per page
19 k happy customers
4.7 out of 5 satisfaction rate
27 writers active

| Drug Legislation Essay

The issue of drug legalization is one that is complex and most people seem not to be in its favor. Despite this, there is a bright as well as a very vocal lot that feels that drug legalization would be the proper course to follow. Proponents of drug legalization have a belief that the existing policies against drugs are harmful to the individuals, families as well as the society. The lot that is against the current drug policies opposes them strongly with a variety of reasons to back up their claims. Some of the reasons that they present are that the drug policies are an infringement to their “constitutional freedoms”(Husak 15). They also view the government as wasting its resources with claims that legalization of the drug trade would generate millions for the government in revenues. They also claim that if drugs were legalized, levels of crime would be overall decline. As discussed in this article further, we see that in real terms the proponents of drug legalization are wrong in the fact that they have not looked at the points that they bring forth to the table in terms of the consequences that would arise as a result of drug legalization in the society (Husak15).

The writer as per this article has clearly and thoroughly presented his arguments to the proponents of the legalization of drugs. The writer replies to some of the questions as well as the arguments that have been presented by the proposers of this bill. The proposers of drug legalization claim that there would be “more benefits” to the legalization of drugs as opposed to the negative effects but the writer bounces back by replying to their claims in a well laid out manner as well as reasonable to the argument (Husak, 1996, pp 159).

So as to indicate the audience that the writer addresses, throughout the essay it is clear that with the arguments that he presents to the table, is the ‘minority’ lot who claim that there would be more benefits that would arise from the legalization of drugs as opposed to the current state of legalization of the drugs. What the writer does so as to indicate his audience is present an argument that opposes the legalization of drugs and also supports his stand by giving reasonable explanations as to why he supports what he believes which is the illegalizaton of drugs. So as to strengthen his argument, the author, follows the rules of proper debating whereby he appreciates as well as tries to understand his opponents point of view and thereafter counter their claims by presenting even more firm answers to support his claim of why drugs should not be legalized. The article when looked upon critically can be addressed to more than one audience on the basis that there are people who believe firmly that they use as well as the legalization of drugs is bad based on their moral upbringing as well as what they were taught in schools. The argument can be presented to this different audience in that they should not only oppose the proponents blindly based on what they have been taught but also try to understand why they claim that drug legalization would be more beneficial as opposed to legalization so as to get to see their viewpoint as well as understand their claims which will in turn mean that they would be able to make a more clear argument on the subject with understanding from both sides of the “debate” (Husak 65).

Why the drugs should be illegal

The writer in his arguments uses a logical approach and explanation to explain further why he believes that drugs should be illegal. He tells of how he has visited drug ridden neighborhoods and has witnessed first hand the effects that have struck as a result of drug use. As he narrates, he makes a comment about how the people that deal with the persons who witness the effects of drugs first hand as the, ‘real drug experts’ (Husak 57). This as he narrates further is people such as the parents of the victims and the police. The writer further goes on to tell a story about how he was in Wichita, Kansas has a conversation with a teenage boy who is now in the his fourth program of treatment and how every time the boy finished a treatment was pressured to get back to the habit by people in the streets especially those who sell the drugs to them. This as per how the writer supports his argument is that the legalization of drugs would mean that they would be more available to such young minds in every corner and would render him almost helpless in fighting the urge of using the drugs as logic dictates. The writer also makes an argument on an ethical ground to further strengthen his support of drug legalization by reasonably portraying the outcome of drug legalization in the sense of a more lazy nation in that the use of drugs affects the mind in that making decisions is blurred which means that people after legalization will tend to be more lazy due to the effects as well as the uncontrollable urge to use the drugs end up doing things such as missing work or school. This from an ethical base of the concept of a moral society would mean the decline of the overall morality of a nation due to the fact that people that use drugs would become less productive. The writer tries to make a humble appeal in the essay from an emotional point of view of the people who are close to the drug users in that person such as parents will suffer so much emotionally when they see their children use the drugs and slowly start suffering the effects of the drugs. The use of the drugs as the writer portrays would also not only hurt the people around the drug users but also the drug users themselves in the sense that their priorities became distorted and on sobering up get to realize how much they have wasted their lives in that they stray off their goals so much and regret deeply of their choices due to their time loss as well as health risks (Husak 302).

The writer uses different appeals in trying to make his audience believe as well as understand what he believes in by employing the use of ethos whereby he explains that with the legalization of drugs, we as human beings would be going against our beliefs that have shaped the society into what it is today which means that the end result would be a society that has drifted much from what as a normal person would describe as ‘moral’ to a society that is filled with people that can barely work and support themselves and their families which is a bad image for the children that look up to them (Husak 211)

The use of the appeal of pathos is also clear in that the writer evokes pity from the audience in making his points across by using stories that evoke pity to the listeners such as that teenager who has been in rehabilitation for his ‘fourth treatment ‘and tries to somewhat create an image of what his loved ones might be going through and how much he himself has suffered from the drugs without his knowledge due to his addictionn.lastly we see the writer use the appeal of logos to bring or rather surface his argument to a more realistic level in explaining why drugs should remain illegal by presenting cases that he himself have witnessed and what many others are seeing everyday as a result of drug abuse (Hurask 266).


A conclusion can be arrived at that with considerations that drugs have many benefits in fields such as “medical and scientific research”, their legalization would mean that from a logical point of view, with legalization, drugs would cripple the nation even more and the government would now have to divulge its attention from fighting drugs as illegal merchandise to educating and rehabilitating the people that suffer the consequences of the drugs in general (Husak 30). As per the arguments of the writer, we therefore see that the legalization of drugs despite points worth looking at are brought about by the proponents, would have a much more devastating effect that if they remain legal (Husak 30).

Works Cited
Husak Douglas N. Drugs and Rights. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992. Print.

Our guarantees

Study Acers provides students with tutoring and help them save time, and excel in their courses. Students LOVE us!No matter what kind of essay paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcers. Save more time for yourself. Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Our Homework Writing Disciplines

With a highly diverse team in almost all academic fields including: