Call us 24/7: + 1(925)399 0085

Get your paper done by an expert

No matter what kind of academic paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcer. Save more time for yourself.

WhatsApp + 1(925)399 0085
$ 10
free
  • bibliography
  • title page
  • revisions
per page
19 k happy customers
4.7 out of 5 satisfaction rate
27 writers active

| The Performance of Employees Essay

Evaluating and motivating the performance of employees is a common practice for the majority of businesses, however, not all the methods have positive outcomes and are accepted by employees. Thus, the idea of this essay is to research and provide personal opinions regarding motivating employees through forced ranking performance appraisal and its alternatives.

Applying the forced ranking system in an organization might be quite contradictory. Most people agree that employees’ work needs to be evaluated and rewarded or penalized depending on the performance. It helps to motivate employees and encourages them to increase the work productivity. However, not all agree that introducing forced ranking performance appraisal in an organization is not an excellent tool for motivating employees.

Few Issues that Decrease the Efficiency of the Forced Ranking System

There are few issues that decrease the efficiency of the system. First, it is not fair, especially when evaluating the work of employees in teams. Every group of the team would receive the same score not taking into account that all of them had different performance.

Furthermore, the ranking system increases competition between co-workers, because everyone wants to become the top employee. It leads to competing with each other instead of increasing their performance results in order to compete with other companies.

Another factor that demolishes the appraisal effectiveness is the personal bias in evaluating the employees’ performance. Few managers can disagree on how to score an employee by estimating his or her performance with different scores.

Thus, I am convinced that the system is more likely to work at the beginning when people know that their performance is being watched. Everyone would be trying to impress their managers and reach the best results. However, it is obvious that not everyone can be the winner, so there will be just a few employees who would be recognized as top employees. So after the first appraisal, most of the employees would feel underestimated, the relationship inside the organization would worsen because of the jealousy and the feeling of being treated unfairly. Additionally, the competition among employees would increase making it almost impossible to complete group projects and have a positive internal climate in an organization.

Type of assignmentWriter levelTitle of your paperPages
Essay Term paper Coursework Research paper Research proposal Grant Proposal Case Study Case Brief Discussion Board Post Reaction paper Response paper Literary analysis Article Review Article Critique Movie Review Movie Critique Book Report Book Review Synopsis Poem Letter Motivation letter Memo Scholarship essay Article writing Blog Article Annotated Bibliography Literature Review Outline Online Test Questions-Answers Multiple Choice Questions Interview Questionnaire Speech Dissertation Dissertation chapter – Abstract Dissertation chapter – Introduction Dissertation chapter – Hypothesis Dissertation chapter – Literature review Dissertation chapter – Methodology Dissertation chapter – Results Dissertation chapter – Discussion Dissertation chapter – Conclusion Thesis Thesis Proposal Thesis/dissertation chapter Capstone Project IB Extended Essay Lab Report Business Report Business plan Marketing Plan White paper Formatting Editing Proofreading Rewriting Revision Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation Poster PDF Poster Excel Exercises High School College University Master’s PHD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500
SpacingTimeframesCurrencyTotal price
Single spaced Double spaced 11 days 9 days 7 days 5 days 4 days 3 days 48 hours 24 hours 12 hours 8 hours 6 hours 3 hours USD EUR GBP AUD

The Equity Theory of Motivation

There are some other motivation theories that explain the forced rating performance appraisal being unpopular amongst employees. For instance, equity theory that is based on the idea of balance illustrates the main reasons of employees reacting negatively to the forced ranking system.

Equity theory demonstrates that the level of motivation correlates with how employees feel they are treated and evaluated by managers at work. Every employee makes a comparison between individual and colleagues’ work input and outcomes. In case the results of the comparison are not matching the decision of the managers reached though appraisal, employees would consider the system as unequal. In this case, the level of dissatisfaction and stress increases. Hence, it leads to an employee having a negative reaction toward the appraisal system and losing the motivation to work.

Another issue is that overestimating the results of personal achievements and believing that no one else deserves being rewarded more is natural to almost every human being. Thus, unless granted a top performer status, an employee would feel unfairly under-rewarded. Moreover, the way managers decide on scoring employees’ performance is rather personal. Sometimes such factors like personal antipathies on subconscious level can provoke giving smaller scores to some employees even without managers realizing it. Every process that involves human factor cannot be always perfect and assure absolutely unbiased outcomes.

This way, it is almost impossible to reach the perfect balance when an employee feels fairly treated with the evaluations made by managers. Thus, in most of the cases, employees have negative reaction to forced ranking in an organization.

The Herzberg’s Two-factor Theory of Motivation

If I had to find an alternative to forced ranking performance appraisal to apply in an organization in order to motivate employees, I would choose Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation. This theory would be a useful solution to the consequences of forced ranking since it provides mechanisms of avoiding dissatisfaction at work.

The idea of the two-factor theory is to satisfy employees’ higher-level needs in order to increase their motivation. According to the theory, factors that can be used for motivating employees are divided into two categories: hygiene and motivator factors. I believe that quality of supervision and inter-personal relations along with financial rewards are the main contributors to motivating employees amongst hygiene factors. Motivating factors like promotion opportunity and gaining recognition are also effective in creating job satisfaction. These factors need to be at the focus after applying the system of forced ranking in a company. Thus, I would suggest rewarding employees on the basis of their personal activity without comparing it to the activity of other employees. It should not be held on the yearly basis but on the basis of successfully completing a project or achieving astonishing results in a specific sphere. It would reduce the competition and improve relationship between employees.

To summarize, Herzberg’s two-factor theory would result in improving employees’ satisfaction with a job, alongside with increasing their motivation and productivity.

Conclusion

Thus, I believe that forced ranking performance appraisal is not an effective way of motivating employees and can only bring positive result on a short-term basis. I suggest using Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation instead, in order to achieve better results in encouraging employees to improve their performance.

Our guarantees

Study Acers provides students with tutoring and help them save time, and excel in their courses. Students LOVE us!No matter what kind of essay paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcers. Save more time for yourself. Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Our Homework Writing Disciplines

With a highly diverse team in almost all academic fields including: