| War is a Necessary Evil Essay
War is a situation that engages a fight between two or more participants, which can be individuals, groups or nations, for a period of time. War may end up with destruction whose magnitude depends on the type of fights, the weapons involved and the time period the war takes. Any war has causes that the fight aims at solving. However, the reason for any war is not a mutually exclusive aim for the participants. Therefore, despite of the destruction that war brings, the attainment of the objectives of either of the participating sides seems to satisfy their feelings. This develops an argument that is in existence since the beginning of World War I, whether war is beneficial or non-beneficial. This brought about this debate, war is a necessary evil.
Type of assignmentWriter levelTitle of your paperPages
Essay Term paper Coursework Research paper Research proposal Grant Proposal Case Study Case Brief Discussion Board Post Reaction paper Response paper Literary analysis Article Review Article Critique Movie Review Movie Critique Book Report Book Review Synopsis Poem Letter Motivation letter Memo Scholarship essay Article writing Blog Article Annotated Bibliography Literature Review Outline Online Test Questions-Answers Multiple Choice Questions Interview Questionnaire Speech Dissertation Dissertation chapter – Abstract Dissertation chapter – Introduction Dissertation chapter – Hypothesis Dissertation chapter – Literature review Dissertation chapter – Methodology Dissertation chapter – Results Dissertation chapter – Discussion Dissertation chapter – Conclusion Thesis Thesis Proposal Thesis/dissertation chapter Capstone Project IB Extended Essay Lab Report Business Report Business plan Marketing Plan White paper Formatting Editing Proofreading Rewriting Revision Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation Poster PDF Poster Excel Exercises High School College University Master’s PHD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500
Single spaced Double spaced 11 days 9 days 7 days 5 days 4 days 3 days 48 hours 24 hours 12 hours 8 hours 6 hours 3 hours USD EUR GBP AUD
According to Karl von Clausewitz in his book On War, war is the continuation of peace policy with means of using force. He argues that the political stands of a country should continue to exist during the war because the insecurity that rises during the wartime is another form of reaction to the situation. He insists on regarding war composed of separate campaigns with linked engagements, one leading to the other (Alexander & Marsha 2003). If this is ignored, then the war engagement may ultimately lead to only disadvantages. War is immeasurable, but only exists in magnitudes. It has varying scales with the participants striving with their physical forces against each other with the aims of throwing the adversary. The defeated will be rendered incapable of resisting. Therefore, in war is a situation to set a compulsory surrender of the enemy with disarmament. War involves the use of skills and equipment that suits the participants at a particular time of the fight.
Arguments and debates over war as a necessary evil traces its ways from long time ago, World War I where the crisis started by hitting Central Europe in 1914. The war came following a long series of clashes between Italy, Austria-Hungarian Empire, France, Germany, the British Empire and Russia. The clashes were over European balance in the power. The war tension became highest out of the Balkan territory and great power between Austria-Hungary and Russia. The winners in the war credited the war to their take over of the territory. Despite the destruction that included life and property losses (the evil part), they fulfilled their mission (necessity).
Another incident that raises such arguments is the war that went over in Libya last year
The wars in Libya rose as a result of the peoples desire for democracy under his ruling, Muammar Gadaffi. The Libyan people went through the war, with a necessity to democracy in their state. The war saw the civilians suffer deaths and encounter the many towns bombings (the evil) with a hope for democracy in their ruling. The international coalitions with the lead of NATO left a bloodshed in the West African country, but winning at the end of the war. The killing of Muammar Gadaffi and the fall of his governance was the long awaited war necessity by the Libyans and the whole international community.
The views in the debate on the holocaust suffering by the Jews under the leadership of Adolf Hitler ascribe the base of the debate, Is War a necessary Evil? It is certain that the beneficiaries of the war (including Hitler) would find it necessary. The evil the war carried is the mass destruction of Jews. The evil of the war is that the holocaust claimed about six million lives. A consideration of the slavery abolition in the northern states is also a ground base for the debate on war, a necessary evil. In late 18th and 19th century, enlighten against slavery shore light following human sentiments. This was the time when Jean Rousseau started spreading enlightening against slavery in the course of democracy upsurge. The revolution war against the slave trade hit trade following enlighten. It was also the enlighten that caused the fight for independence in Haiti state. This was the time slave trade was on the course in the United States.
This essay discusses the debate that lies in the minds of many scholars and philosophers across the world. The debate, War a Necessary Evil, has had controversial issues of social consequences. A rise in a fight has objectives in the minds of the participants. For instance, an enemy with an aim to capture another partys property would wish to benefit form the capture, while the opponent would be to resist the capture for their own good. As war happen leaving destructions, the winner always feels the necessity of the fight. Therefore, this essay predicted and supported that it is truth worth that war is a necessary evil.
The sources of information in this essay were reliable enough
They were relevant to my area of study, stating the historical perspectives on my topic, War, a Necessary Evil. The sources verified earlier findings and researches on the topic. The essay used secondary materials for information sources. The sources consisted of journals, books, reviews on articles, and former writings on the debate topic on the internet. The sources contained references and enabled me to read further on their writings. The sources had reviews with criticisms and support from various researchers. The reviews ensured accuracy hence kept my credibility with the sources.
The internet source on a topic Evaluating Web Resources by Jan Alexander and Marsha Ann Tala of April 2003 has several links to Garfield library, student classes, professors, institutional researchers, government sources and other further readings. The source has citations in text, footnotes, endnotes for clarity and follow up on new words and further explanations. The publishers of the work, Mc-Graw Hill, and the scrutiny he discussed in the traditional styling methods reviews, all proved the credibility of the work.
The debate, Is War a Necessary Evil, is taking new phase each day
The continuing incidences in wars among the undemocratic nations, especially in Africa, are a contribution to the debate. Consideration of the last years wars on Libya against then president Muammar Gaddafi is a good example in this debate. Muammar Gaddafi ruled with violence of human rights and with undemocratic dictatorship. The followed Libyans demonstrations did not earn them any good but instead, it saw them the Gaddafi soldiers beat them up in the streets. The Libyans did not give up with the fights with hopes for a future, democratic Libya (Finkelman, 2006). In fact, the demonstrations now are looked at, as the ones to bring transformations in the Arab world.
The war in the name of Protecting Civilians left much destructions in the country as a follow up of the peoples rights and humanity from the greedy president, Muammar Gadaffi. With all measures underlain, it is a story of unique account. The coalitions of the international community against the rigid Muammar Gaddafi earned him death at the end of the day. Security Council resolutions authorized all that it pertained to ensure the safety and democracy of the Libyans. The whole of the story is aimed at the fulfillment of the desires of the people of Libya and the international community. This is the necessity in the debate War is a Necessary Evil.
The war earned Muammar Gaddafi death. While he thought he would please the west at the expense of the public at home, he never knew of the rage he was cultivating in the people. In 1996, his actions against religious practices left some 1,270 prisoners killed at Tripoli’s Abu Salim jail. The situation led to a reversal of American foreign policy to help the Islamists finish Gaddafi. Rodan (2011) writes as days pass by, it remains apparent that assistance the US and NATO give Islamic Imperialists aims at doing away with Col. Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi was a vocal against the interests of imperial power of the people of the independent Libya, and Africa as whole.
Gadaffi kept Islamic religion far away from politics. He seemed to follow the modern philosophy of governance. This earned him a death price, which is termed as a necessity of the war in this debate, while the people earned the initially denied dignity. Despite the participation, of the international community in the war, the victory of the results belongs to the Libyans.
Consideration of the United States about war in Iraq has significant contributions to the debate: War is a Necessary Evil. The military action for America against the stringent and persistent Iraq under the presidency of Saddam Hussein served the whole world with peace against terrorism. The argument that tried to oppose the fact of American war in Iraq, suggested for containment that did not work for over ten years. The weapons of mass destruction (WMD) of Iraq risked the security of United States. This convinced the United States on links of Iraq with the Al Qaeda terrorists under the leadership of Osama bin Laden. The decision of the United States to change the insecurity regime in Iraq was to destroy the WMD capabilities of Iraq. The effort of United States to curb the menace by containment was failing, hence the plans on war. The plans included elimination of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden (Hammond, John & Matthew, 2011).
The allegations that turned out to be true that Al Qaeda terrorists were in Iraq pushed United States for war in Iraq. Iraq had planned to use the WMD weapons in favor of their terrorism across the world. The need for security improvement was the cause of the American war in Iraq. The combination of WMD weapons and the Al-Qaeda posed insecurity cases across the world including the 1998 Kenyan bombing. It cost the United States political and strategic expertise to clear the foreseen mess, for the well-being of the whole world the necessity of the American war in Iraq.
Most supporters of the war strategies strongly debated on the decisions. Influential Senators and Congressmen in the United States supported the war plans against Iraq. They argued that the US president had a right to initiate war in Iraq. They had no doubts in the president over the war declaration to safeguard the endangered US national security from Iraq with its WMD weapons and association with Al-Qaeda. However, the support, which involved both the Republicans and the Democrats, suggested a move on war in Iraq with consultations from the United Nations.
The international support for the Kenyan war against the Somalias Al-Shabaab today is support for the debate. The war is the base on fight for peace and security I, the Kenyan territory and the boundaries. The Al-Shabaab attacked the Kenyan coast infringing fear into the people of Kenya and their tourists. The attacks were significant, leading to the tourism sector hinge. The illegal terrorism Al-Shabaab group in Somalia was interfering with international trade through capture and seizure of the ships in the Indian Ocean (Mohammed, 2012). The activities of the Al-Shabaab posed a security crisis, not only to Kenya, but also to the states that use the Indian Ocean for either trade or any other economic activity around and in the Indian Ocean. This became an issue to the Kenyan government and since Somalia had no central government, Kenya as a state had only alternative of declaring war against the Al-Shabaab.
The United Nations is currently supporting the war as a necessity to the whole of East and central region. In fact, United States of America is today giving in help on attack of the Al-Shabaab group. The whole world is for the mission for the well-being of the many innocent people that suffered attacks by Al-Shabaab. Although Al-Shabaab is trying to resist by organizing abrupt grenade attacks in Kenya as revenge, the planned war with them is bearing fruits. The notorious illegal group was a stumbling block to the formation of central government in Somalia. This is evident from the re-engineered progress in Somalia after the Kenya war began against the group.
There exist arguments against the debate in war a necessary evil
Criticisms are evolving around the world on situations where countries are deciding on war as the best alternative to bring the necessity it requires. The war in Libya last year came with other undesired destructions. Common people paid prices beyond articulation during the war on Muammar Gadaffi. Libya witnessed more of the NATO destructions than the Gaddafi government itself. The destruction left over 50,000 people killed in the conflict as per the National Transitional Council of Libya. The NATO operations in Libya scheduled over 25,000 sorties leaving more than 9,500 hitting the targets. The NATO bombings were beyond the aim of protecting the Libyans. The bombings hit the whole of the country in search for the colonel Gadaffi.
In Benghazi, the west passed the United Nations 1973 resolution to punish Gaddafi. This finally led to his death with severe destructions at his place of birth, Sirte. Gaddafis ouster left Sirte, which once had brilliant look of hospitals and university, with a shinning entrance and a conference centre that hosted world leaders, is now a squalid ruin. (The BritishTelegraph, 15 Oct 2011). Despite the wars good intention, it brought misery and suffering the Libyans. The deaths and destructions experienced were out of the intention of the war. All these effects sum up to the evil in the war.
Regarding the United States war in Iraq, the debate decisions on the way forward was not justified. The United States had not proved that Iraq hosted the Al Qaeda terrorists and that they had plans to attack America. Questions lingered over the legality of United States proceeding war against Iraq under international law. This would drive wrong implications over the precedents of international law. The United States war necessity did not inspire confidence on installation of peace back to Iraq after the war. The war would bear significant implications on minorities in Iraq. After the war, the minorities would not participate in the Iraq elections as part of the country. The United States War against Iraq destroyed infrastructure through bombings, and rebuilding in the post Saddam phase would be a huge cost to the US. This is also an evil face of the war in this debate.
I am of the view that war is indeed a necessary evil. I feel that some conflicts exist and cannot be resolved any other way. The situations that fall in support for war a necessary evil puts the participants at a critical moment of no or little range of options. Lack of other option apart from going to war using force, would do to restore the security and well-being of the affected party. This especially applies in cases of rights infringement against the allies.
For instance, the Battle of the Passchendaele in Ypres City, Belgium in 1917 that left numbers of deaths and casualties for both the allies and the enemies running into thousands. The battle that started in July 31, 1917, and continued to early 1918, involved war between Canadian Soldiers (allies) and German Soldiers (enemies) who had captured the Passchendaele Ridges. The enemies forcefully captured the Passchendaele Ridges located in the land of importance to the City of Ypres, and wanted to remain the occupants of the City. The war was the most horrific, with death or casualty numbers of 260,000 and 15,000 for the enemies and the allies respectively. This happened at the time the First World War is in its course leading to a hard shudder across the world. Despite the destructions and losses experienced, the win in the war by the allies (Canadian soldiers) satisfied the necessity of the war against the intruders (Subhash, 2002).
The debate is true for the necessity of the war. A situation that leaves the involved party with war as a last resort to clear a conflict embraces war itself. The incidence of the United States and Iraq over the use of unlawful nuclear weapons, and Iraqs threats to attack US through Al-Qaeda, gave the US an option of war declaration. If US would not use war, the necessity part of the argument, then it would suffer the Iraqs attacks. A violent group is best stopped with violet reactions, despite the consequences. This event clearly draws to the importance of the war in a way to protect oneself.
The events of slavery abortion in the USA that led to differences in the opinion between the north and the south escalated to wars as the best way to resolve the matter. The win by the northern states finally embraced the abolition that had caused the war. War as a necessary evil shore light to the southern states to relegate into the abolition system, despite leaving several deaths like that of Lovejoy, in 1837. Such are the arguments in the debate that moved me to the position of support of war, a necessary evil. This is with the reasons tat in every situation that left the war participants with the only option of war; it resulted to a fruitful end (The Canadian Journal, 2005).
The opposing side of the debate bases argument on the immediate results of the war
The war sufferings face the whole group with no exceptions of the innocent. The USA declaration to engage has war in Iraq led to several deaths of the innocent people through the bombings to stop the terrorism by Iraq and the Al-Qaeda. There are also arguments that USA used war as a political tool to gain influence in the Middle East. The aftermath of the war of USA in Iraq is undesirable, with several soldiers crippled during the war. War breeds destruction to mankind infrastructure and the environment. The environmental destruction during war ranges from air pollution to deforestation.
I feel such arguments are for the short-term and immediate effects with a blindfold of the future. The reasons for opposing war; a necessary evil, are true, but have their nature only in the short-term perspective of development, peace and democracy as it pertains the social consequences. This essay described the views on the debate: War a necessary evil. The discussions and examples defend my stand for the debate. The essay results answers my predicted thesis that indeed, war is a necessary evil.
Study Acers provides students with tutoring and help them save time, and excel in their courses. Students LOVE us!No matter what kind of essay paper you need, it is simple and secure to hire an essay writer for a price you can afford at StudyAcers. Save more time for yourself. Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more